Peer review of iAide
My first thought when i read your paper is that you have chosen a extremely hard project. It seem that you want your application to cover a very broad field. So to focus on a smaller area could be a smart idea. One of the ways one could do that is by focusing on man vs machine.

It seems that this research really do touch on the subject between man vs machine. By man vs machine i am thinking about in which situation are a man smarter than an machine and vi ca versa. This seems to be important because when your talking about context aware machine your touching in on a field where a human being are better than a machine. So the hard part is to find areas where a machine is capable to find out about context better than a human. So not so much just try to find every context aware situation a machine can find out about, but also try find the areas that a machine can do better than a human or help a human make better choices.

Also liked that even if you based your first thought on your own thinking, you understood that to get the most of it wasn't enough to think what you would like to have at hand if you went to a cafe, but also that you need to go to a cafe and tried it out. By using Jacob Nilsen`s article "Why You Only Need to Test with 5 users" you found a smart way of solving one of the biggest problems of doing research in a university project, getting enough people to get a proper representation. 

(The other team mate have been sick this week, but hopfully this reviw document will be rewriten early next week.  )