Undervisningsplan

1. Innledning

2. Hvilke sp?rsm?l befatter retorikk seg med? Kort om den antikke tradisjonen.

Pensum: Richards, “Introduction” og kap. 1.

3. Fornyelsen av den retoriske tradisjonen.

Pensum: Richards, kap. 2.

4. Retorikk i dag:

Pensum: Richards, kap. 3.

5.Forskjellige retorikkforst?elser: retorikk som duell og forsoning.

Pensum: Svensson, Trygve C. og Vogt, David C. 2009. ”Konfliktl?sningens retorikk.” Rhetorica Scandinavica 52, 6-32. Eksempler: Lysias, Mot Eratosthenes og Mot Filon, Cicero, For Ligarius

6. F?lger talere retorikkens regler?

Pensum: Frazel, Thomas D. 2009. The rhetoric of Cicero's In Verrem. G?ttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. (Utdrag) Eksempler fra: Cicero, Mot Verres

7. ”En god mann som er dyktig til ? tale” - retorikk og stoisk filosofi.

Pensum: Walzer, Arthur E. 2003. “Quintilian’s ‘Vir Bonus’ and the Stoic Wise Man”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, 25-41 (tilgjengelig p? JSTOR)

8. Forstillelsens retorikk

Pensum: Zerba, Michelle 2004. ”The Frauds of Humanism: Cicero, Machiavelli, and the Rhetoric of Imposture.” Rhetorica, Vol. XXII, Issue 3, 215-240. (Tilgjengelig p? JSTOR) Oppdateringer vil komme

9. Retorisk inventio og paradigmeteorien: retorikk og vitenskapsteori.

Pensum: Gross, Alan G. 2004. “Why Hermagoras Still Matters: The Fourth Stasis and Interdisciplinarity.” Rhetoric Review, Vol. 23. No. 2, 141-55. (Tilgjengelig p? JSTOR)

10.

IN ENGLISH Themes and readings (preliminary list, updates will follow as soon as possible)

1. Introduction

2. What questions does rhetoric deal with? Short about the classical tradition

reading: Richards, “Introduction” og kap. 1.

3. Renewal of the classical tradition

reading: Richards, kap. 2.

4. Rhetorics today

reading: Richards, kap. 3.

5.Competing concepts of rhetoric: struggle and reconciliation.

Reading: Jamieson, Kathleen Hall 1988. Eloquence in an Electronic Age – The Transformation of Political Speechmaking. New York: Oxford University Press. (excerpts)

Examples: Lysias, Against Eratosthenes and Against Philo, Cicero, For Ligarius

6.Do orators follow the rules of rhetoric?

Reading: Frazel, Thomas D. 2009. The rhetoric of Cicero's In Verrem. G?ttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. (excerpts) Examples taken from: Cicero, Against Verres.

7. ”A good man skilled in speaking”: rhetoric and Stoic philosophy

Reading: Walzer, Arthur E. 2003. “Quintilian’s ‘Vir Bonus’ and the Stoic Wise Man”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, 25-41 (download at JSTOR)

8. The rhetoric of imposture

Reading: Zerba, Michelle 2004. ”The Frauds of Humanism: Cicero, Machiavelli, and the Rhetoric of Imposture.” Rhetorica, Vol. XXII, Issue 3, 215-240 (at JSTOR)

9. Rhetorical inventio and the theory of paradigm: rhetoric and the theory of science.

Reading: Gross, Alan G. 2004. “Why Hermagoras Still Matters: The Fourth Stasis and Interdisciplinarity.” Rhetoric Review, Vol. 23. No. 2, 141-55. (at JSTOR)

10.

Publisert 22. nov. 2011 14:43 - Sist endret 19. des. 2011 14:09