MERK at du som masterstudent i tillegg til fellespensumet m? legge opp eget pensum i fht selvvalgt problemstilling p? semesteroppgaven.
Richards, Jennifer 2008. Rhetoric. Oxon: Routledge.
Svensson, Trygve C. og Vogt, David C. 2009. ”Konfliktl?sningens retorikk.” Rhetorica Scandinavica 52, 6-32.
Frazel, Thomas D. 2009. The rhetoric of Cicero's In Verrem. G?ttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. (Utdrag)
Walzer, Arthur E. 2003. “Quintilian’s ‘Vir Bonus’ and the Stoic Wise Man”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, 25-41 (tilgjengelig p? JSTOR)
Zerba, Michelle 2004. ”The Frauds of Humanism: Cicero, Machiavelli, and the Rhetoric of Imposture.” Rhetorica, Vol. XXII, Issue 3, 215-240. (Tilgjengelig p? JSTOR)
Gross, Alan G. 2004. “Why Hermagoras Still Matters: The Fourth Stasis and Interdisciplinarity.” Rhetoric Review, Vol. 23. No. 2, 141-55. (Tilgjengelig p? JSTOR)
IN ENGLISH
Please note that master students must add own readings in relation to their choice of semester essay.
Richards, Jennifer 2008. Rhetoric. Oxon: Routledge.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall 1988. Eloquence in an Electronic Age – The Transformation of Political Speechmaking. New York: Oxford University Press. (excerpts)
Frazel, Thomas D. 2009. The rhetoric of Cicero's In Verrem. G?ttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. (excerpts) Examples taken from: Cicero, Against Verres.
Walzer, Arthur E. 2003. “Quintilian’s ‘Vir Bonus’ and the Stoic Wise Man”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, 25-41 (download at JSTOR)
Zerba, Michelle 2004. ”The Frauds of Humanism: Cicero, Machiavelli, and the Rhetoric of Imposture.” Rhetorica, Vol. XXII, Issue 3, 215-240 (at JSTOR)
Gross, Alan G. 2004. “Why Hermagoras Still Matters: The Fourth Stasis and Interdisciplinarity.” Rhetoric Review, Vol. 23. No. 2, 141-55. (at JSTOR)