* betyr at artikkelen finnes i artikkelsamling som selges p? Kopiutsalget, Gnist Akademika:
1. Store moduler
1.1. Perspektiver p? internasjonalisering og globalisering
*Coe, N.M. et.al, 2004: "Globalizing" regional development: a global production networks perspective, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. NS 29 468-484.
*Harvey, D. 2000. Contemporary globalization. Kapittel 4 i Spaces of Hope, s. 53-73, 20 sider. Held, D. and McGrew, A. 2000. The Great Globalization Debate: An Introduction I D. Held, and A. McGrew (red.): The Global Transformations Reader. Polity Press, s. 1-45. 45 sider.
Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. 2000. Globalisation – a Necessary Myth? I D. Held, and A. McGrew (red.): The Global Transformations Reader. Polity Press, s. 68-75, 7 sider.
*Martin, R. 2004: Editorial: Geography: Making a difference in a globalizing world, Transactions of The Institute of British Geographers. NS 29, 147-150.
*Sassen, S. 1998. Whose city is it? Globalization and the formation of new claims. Globalization and its discontents. The New Press, New York. Kap. 1, side 19-36. 18 sider.
*Sassen, S. 1996: Service employment regimes and the new inequality. I E. Mingione (red.): Urban Poverty and the underclass. A reader. Oxford: Blackwell s. 64-82. 19 sider.
*Storper, M. 1997: The Regional World. Kapittel 9: The World of the City: Local Relations in a Global Economy. S. 221-259. 39 sider.
1.2. Byers indre differensiering
Ulikhet, polarisering og sosio-?konomisk segregasjon
*Bruegel, I. 1996. Gendering the Polarisation Debate: A Comment on Hamnett. Social Polarisation, Economic Restructuring and Welfare State Regimes. Urban Studies, vol. 33, s. 1431-1439. 8 sider.
*Burgers, J. 1996. No polarisation in Dutch Cities? Inequality in a Corporatist Country. Urban Studies, vol. 33, s. 99-105. 7 sider.
*Davis, M. 1997. Fortress L.A. I R.T Legates og F. Stout (red.): The City Reader. London og New York, Routledge, s. 158-163. 6 sider.
*Hamnett, K: Social Polarisation, Economic Restructuring and Welfare State Regimes, 1996. Urban Studies, vol. 33. s. 1407-1430. 24 sider.
*Sassen, S. 2000: Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Pine Forge Press, kapittel 6-7, s. 117-144. 28 sider.
*Wessel, T. (2000): Social polarisation and socio-economic segregation in a welfare state: The case of Oslo. Urban Studies, vol. 37, s. 1947-1967. 21 sider
Etnisk segregasjon og integrasjon av innvandrere
*Blom, S. 1999. Residential concentration among immigrants in Oslo. International Migration, 37, 3, 617-641. 25 sider.
*Jonassen, C. 1949. Cultural values in the ecology of an ethnic group. American Sociological Review, s. 32-41. 10 sider.
*Peach, C. 1997. Pluralist and assimilationist models of ethnic settlement in London 1991. Tijdsschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 88, 2, s. 120-134. 15 sider.
*Zhou, Y. (1998): How do place matter. A comparative study of Chinese Ethnic Economics in Los Angeles and New York City. Urban Geography, vol. 19, s. 531-53. 23 sider
Gentrification
*Hamnett, K. 1991. The blind man and the elephant: the explanation of gentrification. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. N.S., vol. 16, s. 173-89. 17 sider.
*Smith, N. 1996. Local arguments: From consumer sovereignty to the rent gap. The New Urban Frontier. Gentrification and the revanchist city. Routledge, London og New York, s. 51-74. 24 sider.
*Warde, A. 1991. Gentrification as consumption: issues of class and gender. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 9, s. 223-232. 10 sider.
*Wynne, D. and O’Connor, J. 1998. Consumption and the Postmodern City. Urban Studies, vol. 35, s. 841-864. 24 sider
1.3 L?ring og innovasjon
Teoretiske perspektiver
*Fagerberg, J. (2003): Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the litterature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics vol. 13, s. 125-159. 35 s.
*Grabher, G. 1993. Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations, in Grabher, G. (ed) The embedded firm. On the socio-economics of industrial networks, Routledge London and New York. (pp.1-31) 31 sider.
*Lundvall, B.?. (2004): Why the New Economy is a Learning Economy. DRUID Working Paper 04-01. Aalborg University. 11 sider.
*Moulaert, F. og Sekia, A. (2003): Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies vol. 37, s. 289-302. 14 s.
*Perez, C. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. The dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Edwin Elgar, Cheltenham. Kapittel 2 og 3 (27 s).
Regional utvikling, innovasjon og innovasjonspolitikk
*Arbo, P. 2004. Sterke regioner i et n?ringslivs- og innovasjonsperspektiv. I Knudsen, J.P. (red.): Sterke regioner - forskning og reform. Fagbokforlaget. 37 sider.
*Bathelt, H. et.al. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, vol 28, 1, 31-56. 26 sider
Fraas, M. et.al. 2003. Innovasjon og n?ringsutvikling i Vestfold - en truet suksesshistorie. STEP-rapport 2-2003. 100 sider.
*MacKinnon, D. et.al. 2002. Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates. Progress in Human Geography, vol 26, s. 293-311. (18 sider)
*Markusen, A. 1999. Sticky places in slippery space. A typology of industrial dustricts. I Barnes, T. og Gertler, M.S (red.). The New Industrial Geography. Routledge. (29s.)
*Maskell, P. og Malmberg, A. 1999. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 23, 167-185. (18 sider)
*Oughton, C., Landabaso, M. og Morgan, K. 2002. The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy. Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 27, 97-110. Kluwer Academic Publishers (14 sider)
1.4 Byutvikling og -planlegging
Byplanleggingens historie
Hall, P: Cities of tomorrow, 1996. Oxford: Blackwell . Side: 13-47, 87-187, 218-261, 294-351 og 378-403.
B?rekraftig byutvikling
Roo, G de & D. Miller: Compact Cities and Sustainable Urban Development, 2000. Ashgate. Side: 17-41, 53-64, 229-240 og 251-259 (58 sider).
2. Sm? moduler
2.1 Bypolitikk og byers representasjon
*Cochrance, A. et al. 1996. Manchester plays games. Exploring the local politics of globalisation. Urban Studies, vol. 33, s. 1319-1336. 18 sider.
*Hubbard, P. 1996. Urban design and City Regeneration: Social Representations of Entrepreneurial Landscapes. Urban Studies, vol. 33, s. 1441-1461. 21 sider.
*Leitner, H. og Sheppard, E (1998): Economic uncertainty, inter-urban competition, and the efficacy of entrepeurialism. I T. Hall og P. Hubbard (red.): The entrepeneurial city. Geographies of Politics, Regime and representation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York m.fl., s. 294-307. 14 sider.
*Ley, D. & C. Mills, C. 1993. Can There Be a Postmodernism of Resistance in the Urban Landscape. I P.L Knox (red.). The restless urban landscape. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, N.J., s. 255-278. 24 sider.
*Lofgren, A. 2000. A thousand years of loneliness? Globalization from the perspective of a city in a European periphery. Geoforum, s. 501-511. 11 sider.
*Skogheim, R. og P.G.R?e 2003. Makt og meningsdannelse i byutviklingen. Nordisk arkitekturforskning, vol. 16, nr.3. Side 35-42 (8 sider)
2.2 Kommunikasjon, mobilitet og infrastruktur
Graham, Stephen og Marvin, Simon : Splintering urbanism. Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition, 2001. London: Routledge. . Side: 7-16, 217-377, 379-403. 196 sider.