Pensum/l?ringskrav

B?ker

Bratberg, ?ivind (2014) Tekstanalyse for samfunnsvitere. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk. Kap. 1, 3 & 5. (68s)

Daniel Beland & Robert Henry Cox (red.) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press:

  • Berman, Sheri (2011) “Ideology, history and politics”, s. 144-176.
  • Hay, Colin (2011) “Ideas and the construction of interests”, s. 65-82.
  • Mehta, Jal (2011) “The varied role of ideas in politics: from ‘whether’ to ‘how’”, s. 23-46. (Totalt 65s)

J?rgensen, Marianne Winther & Louise Phillips (1999) Diskursanalyse som teori og metode. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag. Kap. 1, 2, 3, 5 (121s)

Nedlastbare tidsskriftsartikler, b?ker og andre nedlastbare tekster

Tidsskriftartikler som has i abonnement ved Universitetsbiblioteket er tilgjengelige gjennom Universitetsbibliotekets database for tidsskrifter. Du m? da ha tilgang til og v?re logget p? UiO-systemet. Gratisressurser er tilgjengelige over Internett. Det er ulike m?ter ? s?ke opp en artikkel p?. S?k p? tittel, tidsskrift eller forfatter. Dersom du har problemer med ? finne den s?kbare litteraturen kan du henvende deg til biblioteket.

APSA: Qualitative Methods - Symposium: discourse and content analysis, Qualitative Methods 2, 1 (2004) s. 15-40. (26s)

Augoustinos, Martha, Amanda Lecouteur & John Soyland (2002) “Self-sufficient arguments in political rhetoric: constructing reconciliation and apologizing to the stolen generations”, Discourse & Society 13, 1: 105-42. (38s)

Banta, Benjamin (2013) “Analyzing discourse as a causal mechanism”, European Journal of International Relations 19, 2: 379-402. (24s)

Berge, Kjell Lars (2014) “Hva er politisk retorikk?” Rhetorica Scandinavica 66/67: 11-34. (24s)

Berman, Sheri (2011) "Ideology, history and politics", i Daniel Beland & Robert Henry Cox (red.) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 144-76. (23s)

Boréus, Kristina (1997): “The shift to the right: neo-liberalism in argumentation and language in the public debate since 1969”, European Journal of Political Research 31: 257-286. (30s)

Carstensen, Martin B. (2011) "Ideas are not as stable as political scientists would want them to be: a theory of incremental ideational change", Political Studies 59: 596-615. (20s)

Coffey, Daniel (2005) “Measuring gubernatorial ideology: a content analysis of state of the state speeches”, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5, 1: 88-103. (16s)

van Dijk, Teun A. (2011) “Introduction: the study of discourse”, i Teun A. van Dijk (red.) Discourse Studies. A Multidiscplinary Introduction. London: Sage, pp. 1-7. (7s)

Dinas, Elias & Kostas Gemenis (2010) "Measuring parties’ ideological positions with manifesto data. A critical evaluation of the competing methods", Party Politics 16, 4: 427-450. (24s)

Finlayson, Alan (2007) “From beliefs to arguments: interpretive methodology and rhetorical political analysis, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9, 4: 545-563. (19s)

Frank, David A. (2011) “Obama’s rhetorical signature: cosmopolitan civil religion in the presidential inaugural address”, Rhetoric & Public Affairs 14, 4: 605-30. (26s)

Gaskarth, Jamie (2006) “Discourses and ethics: the social construction of British foreign policy”, Foreign Policy Analysis 2: 325-341. (17s)

Grimmer, Justin & Brandon M. Stewart (2013) “Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts”, Political Analysis 21, 3: 267-297. (31s)

Hansen, Lene (2006) Security as practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge. Kap. 4-5 (42s)

Krogstad, Anne (2014) "Kunsten ? gj?re ingenting, men v?re alt", Rhetorica Scandinavica 66/67: 35–56. (22s)

Lakoff, George (2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea Green Publishing. Kap. 1 (32s)

Martin, James (2013) “Situating speech: a rhetorical approach to political strategy”, Political Studies. (18s)

Mathisen, Werner C. (1997) ”Diskursanalyse for statsvitere: hva, hvorfor og hvordan”. 亚博娱乐官网_亚博pt手机客户端登录snotat 1/1997. Oslo: Institutt for statsvitenskap, UiO. (34s)

Milliken, Jennifer (1999) “The study of discourse in International Relations: a critique of research and methods”, European Journal of International Relations 5, 2: 225-54. (30s)

Mudde, Cas (1995) “Right-wing extremism analyzed”, European Journal of Political Research, 27(2): 203-224. (22s)

Payne, R.A. (2001) "Persuasion, frames and norm construction", European Journal of International Relations 7(1): 37-61. (24s)

Rauh, Christian (2015) “Communicating supranational governance?” The salience of EU affairs in the German Bundestag, 1991-2013”, European Union Politics 16, 116-38. (23s)

Searle, John R. (1991) “What is a speech act”, s. 254-64 i Steven Davis (red.) Pragmatics: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press (10s)

Skjervheim, Hans (1973) Ideologianalyse, dialektikk, sosiologi. Oslo: Pax. Kap. 11: “Kant: Samfunnsvitskapane sin problematiske posisjon mellom teoretisk og praktisk filosofi”, s. 131–52. (22s)

Szulecka, Julia & Kacper Szulecki (2013) “Analysing the Rospuda River controversy in Poland: rhetoric, environmental activism, and the influence of the European Union”, East European Politics 29, 4: 397–419. (23s)

Wodak, Ruth & Salomi Boukala (2015) "(Supra)National identity and language: rethinking national and European migration policies and the linguistic integration of migrants", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35: 253-73. (21s)

Sum pensum: 880s

Publisert 25. mai 2015 14:26 - Sist endret 7. okt. 2015 08:51