B?ker
Mahoney, James og Dietrich Rueschemeyer (red.): Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
F?lgende kapitler er pensum:
Hall, Peter A. (2003): “Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research”, kap 11, 32 s
Mahoney, James (2003): “Strategies of Causal Assessment in Comparative Historical Analysis”, kap. 10, 36 s
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (2003): “Can one or a few cases yield theoretical gains”, kap. 9, 32 s
Schneider, Carsten Q. and Claudius Wagemann (2012): Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hele boken unntatt kap 10 er pensum (ca 300 s samt. online-ressurser p?: www.cambridge.org/schneider-wagemann )
Nedlastbare tidsskriftsartikler, b?ker og andre nedlastbare tekster
Tidsskriftartikler som has i abonnement ved Universitetsbiblioteket er tilgjengelige gjennom Universitetsbibliotekets database for tidsskrifter. Du m? da ha tilgang til og v?re logget p? UiO-systemet. Gratisressurser er tilgjengelige over Internett. Det er ulike m?ter ? s?ke opp en artikkel p?. S?k p? tittel, tidsskrift eller forfatter. Dersom du har problemer med ? finne den s?kbare litteraturen, kan du henvende deg til biblioteket.
Beers, Steve (2016): “QCA as Competing or Complementary Method? A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach to Protest Event Data.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 19(5): 521-536. 16 s.
Delhey, Jan & Kenneth Newton (2005): “Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Patterns or Nordic Exceptionalism?”, European Sociological Review 21(4): 311-327. 17 s
Frendreis, John P. /1983): "Explanation of Variation and Detection of Covariation: The Purpose and Logic of Comparative Analysis". Comparative Political Science 16 (2): 255-272. (18 s)
Howard, Marc M. (2002): “The weakness of Post-Communist in Civil Society”, Journal of Democracy 13(1): 157-169.13 s
Legewie, Nicolas (2017): “Anchored Calibration: From Qualitative Data to Fuzzy Sets”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 18(3). 23 s
Mahoney, James & Gary Goertz (2004): “The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research”, American Political Science Review 98(4): 653-669. 17 s
Picot, Georg (2014): ?Party systems and social policy: A historical comparison of Italy and Germany”, West European Politics 37: 138-158 21 s.
Posner, Daniel (2004): “The Political Salience of Cultural Differences: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi”, American Political Science Review 98 (4): 529-546. 18 s
Skocpol, Theda (1976): “France, Russia, China: A Structural Analysis of Social Revolutions”, Comparative Studies in Society and History 18(2): 175-210 36 s
Stokke, Olav Scham (2007): “Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Shaming, and International Regime Effectiveness”, Journal of Business Research 60 (5) (2007): 501–511. 11 s
Tarrow, Sidney (2010): “The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Towards a Theory of Practice”, Comparative Political Studies 43(2): 230-259. 30 s.
Van Deth, Jan W. (2009): ?Establishing Equivalence?, kap. 5 i Todd Landman & Neil Robinson (red.): The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics. Lon Angeles: Sage. 17 s
Vis, Barbara (2012): "The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses." Sociological Methods & Research 41 (1):168-198.
Sum pensum: ca. 730 s.