Pensum tilgjengelig i kompendium som kj?pes hos Kopiutsalget
Aberbach, J. D., R. Putnam and B. A. Rockman (1981) Bureaucrats & Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (ss 1-23)
Derlien, Hans-Ulrich. 1996. "The Politicization of Bureaucracies in Historical and Comparative Perspective." In B. Guy Peters and Bert A. Rockman (eds). Agenda for Excellence 2. Administering the State. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers. (ss. 149-162).
Gr?ndahl, ?. N., & Gr?nlie, T. (2005). Politikk og forvaltning i Skandinavia. Ministerstyre, dualisme eller ‘ja takk, begge deler’, i K. Romnit & B. Rothstein (red). Den politiske forvaltning - historiske spor i nutidens bureaukrati. Festskrift til Tim Knudsen. K?benhavn: Forlaget politiske studier (ss. 214-238) (24 s.).
Pensum tilgjengelig via Universitetsbibliotekets nettside
Askim, J. & T. Bach (2018). Political Appointments in a Merit Bureaucracy: the Selection of Agency Chief Executives in Norway. Konferansepaper.[Canvas]
Askim, J., 2015. The Role of Performance Management in the Steering of Executive Agencies: Layered, Imbedded, or Disjointed? Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 38, 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006463
Askim, J., Karlsen, R., & Kolltveit, K. (2018). The spy who loved me? Cross‐partisans in the core executive. Public Administration. 96(2): 243-258
Askim, Jostein, Rune Karlsen, and Kristoffer Kolltveit. 2017. Political appointees in executive government: Exploring and explaining roles using a large-N survey in Norway. Public Administration 95 (2):342–358.
Askim, Jostein; Bjurstr?m, Karl Hagen & Kj?rvik, Jonas (forthcoming). Quasi-contractual ministerial steering of state agencies: Its intensity, modes, and how agency characteristics matter. International Public Management Journal.
Aucoin, P. (2012). New political governance in Westminster systems: impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance, 25(2), 177–199.
Bach, T., & Veit, S. (2018). The Determinants of Promotion to High Public Office in Germany: Partisan Loyalty, Political Craft, or Managerial Competencies? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 254–269. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mux041
Campbell, John L. & Ove K. Pedersen. 2015. Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 13(4): 679–701.
Christensen JG, Opstrup N. (2017) Bureaucratic dilemmas: Civil servants between political responsiveness and normative constraints. Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12312
Christensen, Johan & Cathrine Holst (2017). Advisory commissions, academic expertise and democratic legitimacy: the case of Norway, Science and Public Policy, 44(1): 821–833,
Christensen, J?rgen Gronnegaard, Robert Klemmensen, and Niels Opstrup. 2014. Politicization and the Replacement of Top Civil Servants in Denmark." Governance 27 (2):215–241.
Christensen, T. 2009. "Living in the past? Change and continuity in the Norwegian central civil service." Public Administration Review 69(5):951-61.
Christensen, Tom, and Per L?greid. 2009. "Living in the Past? Change and Continuity in the Norwegian Central Civil Service." Public Administration Review 69 (5):951-961.
Christiansen, Peter Munk, Birgitta Niklasson, and Patrik ?hberg. 2016. "Does politics crowd out professional competence? The organisation of ministerial advice in Denmark and Sweden." West European Politics 39 (6):1230-1250.
Craft J. 2017. Partisan advisers and political policy failure avoidance. Public Administration 95 (2): 327–341.
Dahlstr?m, C., & Holmgren, M. (2017). The Political Dynamics of Bureaucratic Turnover. British Journal of Political Science, 1-14. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000230
Egeberg, M., Trondal, J., 2009. Political Leadership and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Effects of Agencification. Governance 22, 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01458.x
Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2016a). The Politicization of Regulatory Agencies: Between Partisan Influence and Formal Independence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 507-518. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv022
Figenschou, T. U., Karlsen, R., & Kolltveit, K. (2017). Serving the Media Ministers: A Mixed Methods Study on the Personalization of Ministerial Communication. Journal of Press/Politics 29(4): 411-430.
Hollibaugh, Gary E., Gabriel Horton, and David E. Lewis. 2014. "Presidents and Patronage." American Journal of Political Science 58 (4):1024-1042.
Hunter A., Boswell C. (2015) Comparing the Political Functions of Independent Commissions: the Case of UK Migrant Integration Policy, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 17(1): 10–25.
Hustedt T and Salomonsen HH. 2017. Political control of coordination? The roles of ministerial advisers in government coordination in Denmark and Sweden. Public Administration 95 (2): 393–406.
Hustedt, T. & Veit (2017) Policy advisory systems: change dynamics and sources of variation. Policy Sciences 50(1): 41–46
Hustedt, Thurid, and Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen. 2014. "Ensuring political responsiveness: politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies." International Review of Administrative Sciences 80 (4):746-765.
Jacobsen, Knut Dahl. 1960. "Lojalitet, n?ytralitet og faglig uavhengighet i sentraladministrasjonen." Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning vol. 4: 231-48. Tilgjengelig p? http://pacem.no/2008/lojalitet-noytralitet-og-faglig-uavhengighet-i-sentraladministrasjonen/
Kopeck?, Petr, Jan-Hinrik Meyer Sahling, Francisco Panizza, Gerardo Scherlis, Christian Schuster, and Maria Spirova. 2016. "Party patronage in contemporary democracies: Results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions." European Journal of Political Research 55 (2):416-431.
Kristiansen, M.B., 2016. One Scandinavian approach to management by objectives and results? Scand. J. Public Adm. 20, 45–70.
Lewis, David E. 2007. "Testing pendleton's premise: Do political appointees make worse bureaucrats?" Journal of Politics 69 (4):1073-1088.
Maley M. 2017. Temporary partisans, tagged officers or impartial professionals: Moving between ministerial offices and departments. Public Administration 95 (2): 407–420.
Mangset (2015a). "Contextually-Bound Authoritative Knowledge: A Comparative Study of British, French and Norwegian Administrative Elites' Merit and Skills." in Agnes van Zanten, Stephen J. Ball, and Brigitte Darchy-Koechlin (red.). World Yearbook of Education 2015. Elites, Privilege and Excellence: The National and Global Redefinition of Educational Advantage. Routledge.
Mangset (2015b) What Does it Mean to be Part of the Elite? Comparing Norwegian, French and British Top Bureaucrats’ Understandings of the Elite Concept when Applied to Themselves. Comparative Sociology Vol.14: 274–299
Overman, S., Van Genugten, M., Van Thiel, S., 2015. Accountability After Structural Disaggregation: Comparing Agency Accountability Arrangements. Public Administration. 93, 1102–1120.
Page, E. (2012) Policy Without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective. Oxford. Oxford University Press. Kapittel 1 (26 s). Tilgjengelig fra Oxford Scholarship Online DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645138.003.0001
Rouban, L. (2012). Politicization of the Civil Service. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 380-391). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Retrieved from http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-handbook-of-public-administration-2e. doi:10.4135/9781446200506
Schillemans, T., & Pierre, J. (2016). Entangling and disentangling governance and the media. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 1–8.
Shaw R and Eichbaum C. 2017. Politicians, political advisers and the vocabulary of public service bargains: Speaking in tongues? Public Administration 95 (2): 312–326.
t'Hart, P., & Wille, A. (2006). Ministers and Top Officials in the Dutch Core Executive: Living Together, Growing Apart? Public Administration, 84, 121–146.
Thorbj?rnsrud, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Ihlen, ?. (2014). Mediatization in public bureaucracies: A typology. Communications, 39(1), 3–22.
Anbefalt tilleggslitteratur
Bach, T., Hammerschmid, G., & L?ffler, L. (2018). More Delegation, More Political Control? Politicization of Senior Level Appointments in 18 European Countries. Public Policy and Administration. doi: 10.1177/0952076718776356
Egeberg, Morten; Gornitzka, ?se & Trondal, Jarle (2017). Merit-based recruitment boosts good governance: How do European Union agencies recruit their personnel?. International Review of Administrative Sciences. doi: 10.1177/0020852317691342
Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (2016b). "The party politicization of administrative elites in the Netherlands." Acta Politica 51 (4):451-471.
Kolltveit, K., & Thorsen, I. V. (2018). De politiske r?dgiverne: unge broilere eller betrodde (fag)medarbeidere?. Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, 34(1): 21-39.
L?greid, P., Roness, P.G., Rolland, V., 2013. Agencification and Corporatization in Norway 1947–2011. Int. J. Public Adm. 36, 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.791311
Maley, Maria (2018) Understanding the divergent development of the ministerial office in Australia and the UK. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(3): 320-335
Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2008. "The changing colours of the post-communist state: The politicisation of the senior civil service in Hungary." European Journal of Political Research 47 (1):1-33.
Moynihan, D. P., & Roberts, A. S. (2010). The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence: The Bush Administration and the Exhaustion of the Politicized Presidency. Public Administration Review, 70, 572-581. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02178.x
Overman, S., Thiel, S. van, 2016. Agencification and Public Sector Performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries. Public Manag. Rev. 18, 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1028973
Page, E. (2012) Policy Without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective. Oxford. Oxford University Press. S?rlig innledende deler av landkapitlene kap. 2-5. Tilgjengelig fra Oxford Scholarship Online DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645138.003.0001
Page, E. (2012) Policy Without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective. Oxford. Oxford University Press. Kap. 2-3. Tilgjengelig fra Oxford Scholarship Online DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645138.003.0001
Page, E. C. & V. Wright, red. (1999). Bureaucratic elites in Western European states. A comparative analysis of top officials. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Peters, B. G. (2001). The Politics of Bureacracy. Kap. 6 (Politics of bureaucracy). 5. utg. London: Routledge.
Peters, B. G. (2001). The Politics of Bureaucracy. Kap. 3 (Recruitment). 5. utg. London: Routledge.
Peters, B.Guy & J. Pierre, red. (2004). The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: A Quest for Control. London: Routledge
Petrovsky, N., James, O., Moseley, A., & Boyne, G. A. (2017). What Explains Agency Heads’ Length of Tenure? Testing Managerial Background, Performance, and Political Environment Effects. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 591–602. doi:10.1111/puar.12735
Smith, B. (2015) Embedsmanden i det moderne folkestyre. K?benhanvn: Jurist- og ?konomforbundets forlag. https://www.djoef.dk/~/media/documents/bosmith/bo-smith-rapport.pdf?la=da&hash=779099395E127EEF6B17188996CBBE90702E16D9
Sunstein, C. R. Cost-benefit analysis and arbitrariness review. Harvard Environmental Law Review vol. 41: 1-42. http://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Sunstein.pdf
Thorbj?rnsrud, K. (2015). Mediatization of public bureaucracies: Administrative versus political loyalty. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(2), 179-197.
Veit, Sylvia, and Simon Scholz. 2016. "Linking administrative career patterns and politicization: signalling effects in the careers of top civil servants in Germany." International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (3):516-535.