Pensum tilgjengelig i kompendium som kj?pes hos Kopiutsalget
Aberbach, J. D., R. Putnam and B. A. Rockman (1981) Bureaucrats & Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (ss 1-23)
Derlien, Hans-Ulrich. 1996. "The Politicization of Bureaucracies in Historical and Comparative Perspective." In B. Guy Peters and Bert A. Rockman (eds). Agenda for Excellence 2. Administering the State. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers. (ss. 149-162).
Pensum tilgjengelig via Universitetsbibliotekets nettside
Elektroniske artikler er tilgjengelig via Universietsbiblioteket. Se bibliotekets guide for tilgang til elektroniske artikler. Du kan f? tilgang til e-b?ker, tidsskriftartikler, databaser og andre elektroniske ressurser i Oria dersom du er tilknyttet UiO, uansett om du er p? campus eller hjemme.
Askim, J. and T. Bach (2019). Political Appointments in a Merit Bureaucracy: the Selection of Agency Chief Executives in Norway. Konferansepaper. [canvas]
Askim, J., 2015. The Role of Performance Management in the Steering of Executive Agencies: Layered, Imbedded, or Disjointed? Public Performance & Management Review 38(3): 365–394.
Askim, J., Karlsen, R., & Kolltveit, K. (2018). The spy who loved me? Cross‐partisans in the core executive. Public Administration. 96(2): 243-258
Askim, Jostein, Rune Karlsen, and Kristoffer Kolltveit. 2017. Political appointees in executive government: Exploring and explaining roles using a large-N survey in Norway. Public Administration 95 (2):342–358.
Askim, Jostein; Bjurstr?m, Karl Hagen & Kj?rvik, Jonas (2019). Quasi-contractual ministerial steering of state agencies: Its intensity, modes, and how agency characteristics matter. International Public Management Journal 22(3), s 470-498.
Aucoin, P. (2012). New political governance in Westminster systems: impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance, 25(2), 177–199.
Bach, T. and K. Wegrich (forthcoming). Politicians and Bureaucrats in Executive Government. The Oxford Handbook of Political Executives. R. B. Andeweg, R. Elgie, L. Helms, J. Kaarbo and F. Müller-Rommel, Eds.[canvas]
Bach, T., and Veit, S. (2018). The Determinants of Promotion to High Public Office in Germany: Partisan Loyalty, Political Craft, or Managerial Competencies? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 254–269.
Bach, T., Hammerschmid, G., and L?ffler, L. (2018). More Delegation, More Political Control? Politicization of Senior Level Appointments in 18 European Countries. Public Policy and Administration.
Campbell, John L. & Ove K. Pedersen. 2015. Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 13(4): 679–701.
Christensen, J. G., & Opstrup, N. (2018). Bureaucratic dilemmas: Civil servants between political responsiveness and normative constraints. Governance, 31(3), 481-498.
Christensen, Johan & Cathrine Holst (2017). Advisory commissions, academic expertise and democratic legitimacy: the case of Norway, Science and Public Policy, 44(1): 821–833,
Christensen, J?rgen Gronnegaard, Robert Klemmensen, and Niels Opstrup. 2014. Politicization and the Replacement of Top Civil Servants in Denmark. Governance 27 (2):215–241.
Christensen, T. 2009. Living in the past? Change and continuity in the Norwegian central civil service. Public Administration Review 69(5):951-61.
Christensen, Tom, and Per L?greid. 2009. Living in the Past? Change and Continuity in the Norwegian Central Civil Service. Public Administration Review 69 (5):951-961.
Christiansen, Peter Munk, Birgitta Niklasson, and Patrik ?hberg. 2016. Does politics crowd out professional competence? The organisation of ministerial advice in Denmark and Sweden. West European Politics 39 (6):1230-1250.
Dahlstr?m, C., & Holmgren, M. (2019). The Political Dynamics of Bureaucratic Turnover. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 823-836.
Egeberg, M., Trondal, J., 2009. Political Leadership and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Effects of Agencification. Governance 22, 673–688.
Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (2008). Revisiting politicization: Political advisers and public servants in Westminster systems. Governance, 21(3), 337-363.
Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2016b). The Politicization of Regulatory Agencies: Between Partisan Influence and Formal Independence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 507-518.
Figenschou, T. U., Karlsen, R., & Kolltveit, K. (2017). Serving the Media Ministers: A Mixed Methods Study on the Personalization of Ministerial Communication. Journal of Press/Politics 29(4): 411-430.
Hollibaugh, Gary E., Gabriel Horton, and David E. Lewis. 2014. Presidents and Patronage. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4):1024-1042.
Hunter A. & Boswell C. (2015) Comparing the Political Functions of Independent Commissions: the Case of UK Migrant Integration Policy, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 17(1): 10–25.
Hustedt T and Salomonsen HH. 2017. Political control of coordination? The roles of ministerial advisers in government coordination in Denmark and Sweden. Public Administration 95 (2): 393–406.
Hustedt, Thurid, and Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen. 2014. Ensuring political responsiveness: politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Sciences 80 (4):746-765.
Jacobsen, Knut Dahl. 1960. Lojalitet, n?ytralitet og faglig uavhengighet i sentraladministrasjonen. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning vol. 4: 231-48.
Kopeck?, Petr, Jan-Hinrik Meyer Sahling, Francisco Panizza, Gerardo Scherlis, Christian Schuster, and Maria Spirova. 2016. Party patronage in contemporary democracies: Results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions. European Journal of Political Research 55 (2):416-431.
Kristiansen, M.B., 2016. One Scandinavian approach to management by objectives and results? Scand. Journal of Public Administration 20, 45–70.
Lewis, David E. 2007. Testing pendleton's premise: Do political appointees make worse bureaucrats? Journal of Politics 69 (4):1073-1088.
Mangset, M. (2015a). Contextually-Bound Authoritative Knowledge: A Comparative Study of British, French and Norwegian Administrative Elites' Merit and Skills. in Agnes van Zanten, Stephen J. Ball, and Brigitte Darchy-Koechlin (red.). World Yearbook of Education 2015. Elites, Privilege and Excellence: The National and Global Redefinition of Educational Advantage. Routledge.
Mangset, M. (2015b) What Does it Mean to be Part of the Elite? Comparing Norwegian, French and British Top Bureaucrats’ Understandings of the Elite Concept when Applied to Themselves. Comparative Sociology Vol.14: 274–299
Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2008. The changing colours of the post-communist state: The politicisation of the senior civil service in Hungary. European Journal of Political Research 47 (1):1-33.
Moynihan, D. P., & Roberts, A. S. (2010). The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence: The Bush Administration and the Exhaustion of the Politicized Presidency. Public Administration Review, 70, 572-581.
?hberg, P., Munk Christiansen, P. & Niklasson, B. (2017). Administrative politicization or contestability? How political advisers affect neutral competence in policy processes. Public Administration, 95(1), 269-285.
Overman, S., Van Genugten, M., Van Thiel, S., 2015. Accountability After Structural Disaggregation: Comparing Agency Accountability Arrangements. Public Administration. 93, 1102–1120.
Panizza, F., Peters, B. G., and Ramos Larraburu, C. R. (2019). Roles, trust and skills: A typology of patronage appointments. Public Administration 97(1), 147-161.
Petrovsky, N., James, O., Moseley, A., & Boyne, G. A. (2017). What Explains Agency Heads’ Length of Tenure? Testing Managerial Background, Performance, and Political Environment Effects. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 591–602.
Schillemans, T., & Pierre, J. (2016). Entangling and disentangling governance and the media. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 1–8.
Shaw R and Eichbaum C. 2017. Politicians, political advisers and the vocabulary of public service bargains: Speaking in tongues? Public Administration 95 (2): 312–326.
t'Hart, P., and Wille, A. (2006). Ministers and Top Officials in the Dutch Core Executive: Living Together, Growing Apart? Public Administration, 84, 121–146.
Thorbj?rnsrud, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Ihlen, ?. (2014). Mediatization in public bureaucracies: A typology. Communications, 39(1), 3–22.
Anbefalt tilleggslitteratur
Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (2016a). The party politicization of administrative elites in the Netherlands. Acta Politica 51 (4):451-471.
Gr?ndahl, ?. N., and Gr?nlie, T. (2005). Politikk og forvaltning i Skandinavia. Ministerstyre, dualisme eller ‘ja takk, begge deler’, i K. Romnit and B. Rothstein (red). Den politiske forvaltning - historiske spor i nutidens bureaukrati. Festskrift til Tim Knudsen. K?benhavn: Forlaget politiske studier (ss. 214-238) [kompendium]
Kolltveit, K., & Thorsen, I. V. (2018). De politiske r?dgiverne: unge broilere eller betrodde (fag)medarbeidere?. Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, 34(1): 21-39.
L?greid, P., Roness, P.G., Rolland, V., 2013. Agencification and Corporatization in Norway 1947–2011. Int. J. Public Adm. 36, 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.791311
Maley, Maria (2018) Understanding the divergent development of the ministerial office in Australia and the UK. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(3): 320-335
Overman, S., Thiel, S. van, 2016. Agencification and Public Sector Performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries. Public Manag. Rev. 18, 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1028973
Page, E. (2012) Policy Without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective. Oxford. Oxford University Press. Kap 1 og innledende deler av landkapitlene kap. 2-5. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645138.003.0001
Smith, B. (2015) Embedsmanden i det moderne folkestyre. K?benhavn: Jurist- og ?konomforbundets forlag.
https://www.djoef.dk/~/media/documents/bosmith/bo-smith-rapport.pdf?la=da&hash=779099395E127EEF6B17188996CBBE90702E16D9
Sunstein, C. R. Cost-benefit analysis and arbitrariness review. Harvard Environmental Law Review vol. 41: 1-42.
Thorbj?rnsrud, K. (2015). Mediatization of public bureaucracies: Administrative versus political loyalty. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(2), 179-197.