Pensum for modul 1: Introduksjonsmodul
Sismondo, Sergio 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Wiley-Blackwell (kap. 1-6; 9-10)
Tidd & Bessant 2019. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th Edition. (kap. 1-2; 5-6; 9)
Nelson, R. & Winter, S. 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press. (kap. 1) (digitalt tilgjengelig - se Google Scholar)
Edquist, Charles 2005. “Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges”, i Fagerberg, Jan, Movery, David C. og Richard R. Nelson (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, s. 181-208
Hughes T., (1987), "The Evolution of Technological Systems", in Bijker et al. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 51 – 82.
Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar 1986 [1979]. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. “Chapter 2” (s. 43-90)
Powell, Walter W. og Stine Grodal 2005. “Networks of Innovators”, i Fagerberg, Jan, Movery, David C. og Richard R. Nelson (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, s. 56-85
Bijker, W. 2010. How is technology made? That is the question. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2010, 34, 63–76
Fagerberg, Jan (2003): 'Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13 (2),pp 125-59.
Freeman, Christopher (1995): 'The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (1), pp 5-24
Kuhn, T.S. (1977) “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”, pp. 165-177, in Kuhn, T.S. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Merton, R. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science, Science, Vol. 159, No. 3810 (Jan. 5, 1968), pp. 56-63
Fagerberg, Jan et al. (eds.) (2005): Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Pensum for modul 2: Science & Technology Studies (STS)
Asdal, Kristin 2011. Politikkens natur - naturens politikk. Universitetsforlaget. 304 sider.
Asdal, Brenna og Moser 2007. Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub 350 sider - ?pen tilgang
Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes & Yannick Barthe 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. 300 sider.
Collins, Harry & Trevor Pinch (eds.) 1998. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 163 sider.
Turkle, Sherry 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books. 360 sider.
Kompendium (kj?pes i Kopiutsalget hos Akademika)
Akrich, Madeleine 1992. "The De-Scription of Technical Objects" i Bijker, Wiebe E. og John Law, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 205-224.
Berg, Anne-Jorunn 1999. ”A gendered socio-technical construction: the smart house” i Donald MacKenzie og Judy Wajcman: The Social Shaping of Technology, Second Edition, Buckingham: Open University Press, s. 301-313.
Foucault, Michel. 2002. "Regjering" i Forelesninger om regjering og styringskunst. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk, s. 39-71.
Haraway, Donna 1991. “Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective” in D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge, s. 183-201
Hilgartner, Stephen 2000. ?Staging authoritative reports? i Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford University Press, s. 42-70.
Latour, Bruno 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. “Chapter 2” (s. 63-100) og “Chapter 3”, (s. 103-144).
Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar 1986 [1979]. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. “Chapter 2” (s. 43-90)
Mol, Annemarie 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press. “Chapter 1” (s. 1-27) og “Chapter 2” (s. 29-51)
Moser, Ingunn & Thygesen, Hilde 2013. “Velferdsteknologi og teleomsorg: Nye idealer of former for omsorg”, i Tjora, Aksel og Line Melby (red.) Samhandling for helse. Gyldendal Akademisk, s. 144-158.
Oudshoorn, Nelly og Trevor Pinch 2003. “Introduction”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly & Trevor Pinch (red.) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s. 1-25.
Wyatt, Sally 2003: ?Non-Users also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly and Trevor Pinch, How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 67-79.
Digital tilgang (artikler)
Beaulieu, Scharnhorst, Wouters 2007. “Not just another case study: A middle range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of E-science”, I Science, Technology and Human Values, 32(6): 672-692:
Druglitr?, Tone 2012. ? skape en standard for velferd: Fors?ksdyr i norsk biovitenskap, 1953-1986. ?Kap. 1: Introduksjon? (s.11-22), ?Kap. 2: Teoretiske ressurser, metoder og materiale? (s. 23-47), og ?Kap. 6: Kyndig stell? (s. 141-167). PhD-avhandling, TIK Senter for Teknologi, Innovasjon og Kultur, Universitetet i Oslo - ?pen tilgang
Felt, Ulrike og Maximilian Fochler, 2013. “What science stories do: Rethinking the multiple consequences of intensified science communication” i Baranger, Patrick & Bernard Schiele (red) Science Communication Today. International perspectives, Issues and Strategies. Paris: CNRS Editions, s. 75-90.
Hermansen, Erlend A. T. 2015. "I Will Write a Letter and Change the World: The Knowledge Base Kick-Starting Norway’s Rainforest Initiative", i Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 3 (2): 34-46.
Hine, Christine 2007. ?Multisited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS?. Science, Technology and Human Values, 32(6): 652-71.
Jensen, Casper Bruun 2005: “Citizen projects and consensus building at the Danish Board of Technology: on experiments in democracy”, i Acta Sociologica 48, s. 221-235.
Kuhn, T.S. 1977. “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”, pp. 165-177, in Kuhn, T.S. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Latour, Bruno 2004. “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern”, i Critical Inquiry 30, s. 225-248.
Law, John 2007: ANT and material-semiotics
Moser, Ingunn og Thygesen, Hilde 2014. “Prosjekteriets dilemma: Mellom avgrenset prosjekt og muligheter for l?ring i teleomsorg og velferdsinnovasjon”, i Tidsskrift for forskning i sygdom og samfund, 21, s. 57-75.
Pinch, Trevor and Wiebe E. Bijker 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other”, i Social Studies of Science 14 (3), s. 399-441.
Pols, Jeannette 2012. “Chapter 8: Innovating care innovation?, in Care at a Distance. On the closeness technology - open access
Pols, Jeanette 2010. “The heart of the matter. About good nursing and telecare”, i Health Care Analysis18 (4): 374-388.
Ruppert, Evelyn, John Law, Mike Savage 2013. "Reassembling the Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices" in Theory, Culture & Society, 30 (4)pp. 22-46
Winner, Langdon 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109 (1) s. 121-136.
Wyatt, S. (2008): "Technological determinism is dead. Long live technological determinism", i The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3. utgave. MIT press, s. 165-180.
Wynne, Brian 1992. "Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science", i Public Understanding of Science 1(3), s. 281-304.
Wynne, Brian 2010. “Strange Weather, Again. Climate Science as Political Art”, i Theory, Culture & Society 27 (no. 2-3): 289-305.
Anbefalt tilleggslitteratur
Jasanoff, Sheila 2004. States of Knowledge: The coproduction of science and the social order. Routledge.
Jasanoff, Sheila et al 1995. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Seven Oaks: Sage.
Marres, Noortje 2012. Material Participation. Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 206 sider.
Sismondo, Sergio 2010. An introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Blackwell Publishing.
Skj?lsvold, Tomas Moe 2015. Vitenskap, teknologi og samfunn. En introduksjon til STS. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Pensum for modul 3: Innovasjonsstudier
Nelson, R. & Winter, S. 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press. (kap. 1-5) (digitalt tilgjengelig - se Google Scholar)
Miles, I. 2005. Innovation in Services. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg; D.C. Mowery; and R.R. Nelson. Oxford Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 1.
Edquist, C. 2005. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg; D.C. Mowery; and R.R. Neldon, 181-208: Oxford University Press.
Abernathy W. J. & Clark, K.B. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction, Research Policy 14: 3-22.
Castellacci, F., Grodal, S., Mendonca, S. & Wibe, M. 2005. Advances and Challenges in Innovation Studies. Journal of Economic Issues 39: 91-121.
Castellacci, F. 2007. Evolutionary and new growth theories: Are they converging? Journal of Economic Surveys 21: 585-627.
Chesbrough, H. W. 2011. The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review Winter 2011: 35-41.
Cohen, M.D. and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128-152.
David, P.A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review 75:332-337.
Edler, J. & Fagerberg, J. 2017 Innovation policy: what, why, and how, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 33, Number 1, pp. 2-23
Eisenhardt, K. M.1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550.
Fagerberg, J.; D. Mowery; and B. Verspagen. 2008. Innovation-systems, path dependency and policy: The co-evolution of science, technology and innovation policy and industrial structure in a small, resource-based economy. In Paper presented in the Prime-Latin America Conference in Mexico City, September 24-26.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Verspagen, B. (2009). The evolution of Norway's national innovation system. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 431-44.
Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31:1257-1274.
Geels, F.W. & Schot, J. 2007 Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Research Policy, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp. 399-417
Hartley, J. 2005. Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money and Management 25:27-34.
Jensen, M.B.; B. Johnson; E. Lorenz; and B.?. Lundvall. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36:680-693.
Kline, S.J. and N. Rosenberg. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy - Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, ed. R. Landau and N. Rosenberg. Washington: National Academy Press.
March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2:71-87.
Martin, B.R. 2015. Twenty Challenges for Innovation Studies. SPRU Working Paper Series SWPS 2015-30 (November), SPRU Science Policy Research Unit / University of Sussex.
Mazzucato, M. 2018. Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change 5:803-815.
Nelson, R.R. 2011. The Moon and the Ghetto revisited. Science and Public Policy 38:681-690.
OECD. 2017. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Norway 2017. In OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Powell, W.W.; K.W. Koput; and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly:116-145.
Schot, J. and W.E. Steinmueller. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47:1554-1567.
Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21: 1147-1161.
Tushman, M.L. and C.A. O'Reilly. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38.
Van de Ven, Andrew H. (2017) The innovation journey: you can't control it, but you can learn to maneuver it, Innovation, 19:1, 39-42
Tidd & Bessant 2019. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th Edition