B?ker
Olafsen, A.J. og Maugesten, M. (2015). Matematikkdidaktikk. 2. utgave. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget
(kap 1 – 10)
B?ker tilgjengelig digitalt
Lee, C. (2006). Language for learning mathematics. Assessment for learning in practice. Open University Press.
(kap 1 – 2)
Artikler og bokkapitler i kompendiet
Bj?rqvist, O. (2001). Matematisk probleml?sing. I B. Grevholm (red), Matematikdidaktik – ett nordisk perspektiv, s. 115 – 132. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Har, Y. B. (2009). Teaching of algebra. I L.P. Yee & L.N. Hoe (red.). Teaching secondary school mathematics. A resourse book, s 25 – 50. Singaporte: McGraw Hill.
Solvang, R. (1992). Kap. 5: Kunnskaps- og forst?elsestyper i matematikkl?ringen. I R. Solvang (red.), Matematikk-didaktikk, s. 75 – 105. Oslo: NKI-Forlaget.
Artikler og bokkapitler tilgjengelig digitalt
Ball, D.L., Thames M.H., Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for Teaching – what makes it special?. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), s. 389-407. http://jte.sagepub.com/content/59/5/389.full.pdf+html
Di Martino, P. & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. I Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1) s. 27 – 48. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10857-009-9134-z
Niss, M. & H?jgaard Jensen, T. (2002). Del II. Kompetencer som middel til fagbeskrivelser af matematik. I M. Niss & H?jgaard Jensen, T. (red), Kompetencer og matematikl?ring. K?benhavn: Undervisningsministeriet. (kap 3 og 4) s. 37–72. http://static.uvm.dk/Publikationer/2002/kom/hel.pdf
Heid, M. K., Thomas, M. O. J., & Zbiek, R. M. (2013). How Might Computer Algebra Systems Change the Role of Algebra in the School Curriculum? I M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (red.), Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education (s. 597-641). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_20
Lew, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T., Mejia-Ramos, J., & Weber, K. (2016). Lectures in advanced mathematics. Why students might not understand what the mathematics professors are conveying to say. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 162.